That's correct. We certainly know that percentage-wise it's a very small percentage of travellers who at the moment have their devices seized.
I think there are two concerns that animate our position. One, of course, is the domestic constitutional concern, which is not relevant to the committee in the same way. The other is a risk of selective searches. For example, we have seen cases of racial or religious profiling in the people who are singled out for device searches. We've also had at least one incident of a Canadian journalist, for example, being singled out at the border, and certainly press freedom associations here, and their counterparts in other countries, are concerned about the freedom to travel of journalists and others.
The concern even with the small percentage is that even when there's no protection or limitation, the searches can target individuals on impermissible bases, and that can really have an effect on freedom of movement and freedom of speech.