I think that would be a matter of experience. I take your point. My argument would be, hypothetically, that the most serious ways in which entry or exit information might be used probably bear on national security matters, although not always. It could be human smuggling and child abduction cases, and so on. The repeated matters of concern are likely to be in the broad national security field so that if you have some kind of review system in place for CBSA that primarily focuses on national security, my guess would be—and it's just a guess—it would capture most of what you really want to have reviewed.
On October 24th, 2017. See this statement in context.