Okay. The approval is required for the second part.
For Mr. Rigby, what is the justification for Bill C-59 changing the definition of “terrorist propaganda” in the Criminal Code? It raises the evidentiary standard beyond what is the factual reality of current practices in radicalization, recruitment, and facilitation, and actually duplicates what is already the crime of counselling a criminal offence in section 22 of the Criminal Code.
In light of this, will the government consider removing the proposed amendment in Bill C-59 relating to terrorist propaganda?