There are a couple of things.
One is that false positives are a regrettable reality, I suppose, of any list of this kind, whether it's a Canadian list or a list composed by our allies. An effort has to be made to try to ensure that the number of false positives are as small as possible and if false positives do emerge it's a recourse mechanism.
As you'll be aware, the government is working on regulation and technical practices that would allow the government to control the SATA, the Secure Air Travel Act list, rather than it being in the hands of airlines to determine who should board or not board, in consultation with the government. It would be a centralized function. I think that's a very necessary reform. Government officials have testified before this committee that it's going to be a complex reform and it's going to take some time. It's certainly worth pressing the government to make sure that this key measure takes place. As it takes place, it will make the government responsible for false positives rather than a murky responsibility shared between airlines and the government itself and they will be better placed to try to address it. They're engaged in temporary measures of redress, which may or may not be satisfactory, but the overall solution, I think, will have to come with that centralized mechanism and the funding for it.