Thank you. I will pick up on the questions of my colleague, Mr. Blaikie.
The Supreme Court found that the previous labour regime was “more restrictive than necessary to maintain the Force's neutrality, stability and reliability”. I recognize that resourcing is excluded for specific reasons. Given binding arbitration and the additional factor of operational effectiveness to the RCMP that's going to be included and must be taken into account by the arbitrator, why would we exclude conduct, including harassment, from the bargaining table?