I really appreciate your question, Mr. Di Iorio. As a lawyer, you have a great deal of experience in that area.
and labour lawyer. We've had some of these discussions.
First of all, during the consultations, overwhelmingly members preferred binding arbitration, and we understood that. I think you're suggesting that these binding arbitrations can be expensive to employers. That's part of the process, ultimately, in a negotiated process with binding arbitration, and we accept that. We're looking at some of the examples of what has happened in other jurisdictions and at their experiences.
One thing that is clear is that we have a responsibility to move forward to honour the Supreme Court, and we're moving forward with collective bargaining and a binding arbitration process to settle any disagreements that ultimately exist.
Manon may want to add something concerning the number.