I might look at the problem the other way round. The entity that has been added to the limited group is the committee of parliamentarians. I hope you're not suggesting that it's parliamentarians who present a threat.
This new committee of parliamentarians will take a more direct approach to the facts. CSIS has been around for 30 years, and I believe in all modesty that our experience has shown that we haven't been in the news for the wrong reasons. We have managed to maintain confidentiality.
Confidentiality is still a very important factor, but trust is as well. We need to establish that trust and a sense of responsibility among the organizations not here contemplated.
Consider this example. The Department of Finance is not used to seeing someone come in to determine whether something isn't right from a national security standpoint. If that department, or the Department of Agriculture and Agri-food or Transport or any other federal government entity, is concerned by a national security issue, it should be glad that independent organizations are verifying whether its work is being done right and that it isn't making any mistakes in its national-security-related actions.
You must have noticed that Canadians would like to know more about what is going on. They also want to be certain the law is obeyed. I think Bill C-59 meets that demand.