I would say that any law has to be interpreted purposively and with the limitations imposed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As I said, advocacy and promotion have both been canvassed extensively by all courts, including at the Supreme Court of Canada in a variety of cases. The Keegstra, Mugesera, and Sharpe cases have dealt with these concepts at the Supreme Court of Canada. B'nai Brith intervened in a couple of them. I myself intervened in the Sharpe case through another NGO at the time.
It's possible to think about any law that can be abused or misinterpreted or misapplied, but what we're looking at is what the law is intended to get at. There are some real problems there. One of the examples that the court gave, in one of these cases, is that in one of Shakespeare's plays, there's the statement, “Let's kill all the lawyers”.