If I could just add to that, we need to ensure that conceptually there is no narrowing, so that our security agencies can properly deal with the threats of terrorism today and the threats of terrorism that exist tomorrow.
On the Justice Canada website right now, in a description of Bill C-51 discussing the criminalization of the advocacy or promotion of terrorism offences in general, it states that:
It is directed at prohibiting the active encouragement of the commission of terrorism offences and not mere expressions of opinion about the acceptability of terrorism.
A sentence later states:
It extended the concept of counselling to cases where no specific terrorism offence is being counselled, but it is evident nonetheless that terrorism offences are being counselled.
I think we need to be careful about narrowing it as if that were handcuffing our security apparatus from dealing with the threats of terrorism into the future.