The one that sticks out for me in that is critical infrastructure protection, and I've had conversations about public safety and the RCMP. It's in SCISA, it's linked to national security. But given how the RCMP is set up, it's usually not national security. Sometimes it is but for the most part it isn't. That's where the challenge is for us in trying to notionally define what is closely related to national security or elements like that. Same with the issue of intelligence, and I know it's been raised here. It's not listed as part of the mandate change for CRCC; the word intelligence has been omitted because the RCMP does intelligence-led policing; that's what they do. It's in the national security and every other aspect of their mandate. If we were to restrict to everything the RCMP does in collecting intelligence as national security, it would probably be almost every complaint we have to a degree. That's really a definitional issue. We would look to NSIRA and how they frame it, and we would look to the RCMP and how they frame some issues. Just because the RCMP is collecting intelligence on a protest, and doing it perhaps in plain clothes, doesn't necessarily mean it's a national security matter. We would probably make the call to find out—
