Thank you.
I'd like to ask Monsieur Bensimon or Mr. Blackburn to answer this question.
Ms. Damoff, in her opening remarks, indicated that the board had categorically refused to accept the so-called strategy of allowing Mr. Gallese to have his sexual needs met as part of his rehabilitation program. A CBC story says the board raised serious questions about that as a “risk management strategy”, but nevertheless listed his likelihood of reoffending as “low to moderate”, and then said that the board “expects the assessment that culminated in this approach to be re-examined.”
This seems to me to be a little less than categorically refusing to allow this to be part of his conditions of release, but would you agree with that, or am I off base here?