The chair is in a bit of a dilemma here, because the mover of the original motion saw the amendment to the motion as a friendly amendment, and therefore incorporated it into the original motion. The arguments have gone now along the line that these are actually separate considerations, possibly related at one level, but mostly separate considerations.
At this point, it's one motion. Unless the movers say otherwise, that's what's on the floor.
We have Pam, and then Kristina.
You're on mute. You are having a John McKay moment.