There's certainly value in what Pam, Joël and Jack are all saying, definitely, in advance of moving into that study. However, why don't we, again, attempt to do first things first and actually close off work, instead of playing leap-frog over our own work and dragging out the timelines, and seek to actually invite the witnesses who remain on the list for the Levesque study for that second hour on Wednesday? That seems to me to be the proper order to do things in to actually complete our work. Other than that, as all three have said, it is important and will be valuable for the committee when we're on that issue.
On January 25th, 2021. See this statement in context.