I'm sorry, Mr. Chair, but it was my understanding that Glen withdrew his subamendment to Kristina's amendment. Wouldn't we procedurally be currently in discussions on Kristina's amendment, which replaced, I believe—this is going from memory—the May 10 deadline, which was the subject of some controversy at the conclusion of the last meeting, in order to ensure that it wouldn't be made out of order for the deliberations taking place now?
All the scheduling is fair discussion, and I think it lends towards the larger debate, but my understanding is that there is currently an amendment on the floor that needs to be dealt with before any further decisions can be made.