Essentially what we're saying here with the amendments is that we don't really want to study this. I definitely think it's an important issue that we should study, and I completely understand and agreed with Kristina's original amendment that we should do it after finalizing the reports on the work we've already done. I don't see why we wouldn't finalize the work we've done and table certain things in the House.
It's definitely a really important issue, and I think it would be important to do once those two reports have been tabled in the House and once we finalize them. Having read the subcommittee report and knowing how long it takes us to actually go through the different reports and to complete them and accept all the recommendations, and judging by the policing study that we just finished, I would say that obviously we won't finish before the end of June all of the things that are listed on that agenda.
If we are actually serious about this being a serious topic that we want to study, I strongly encourage us to find a way forward and a way that makes sense, and not just to say “after the work that's listed in the subcommittee” because that won't allow us time to even begin this study.