Yes. We talked about the fact that there was an Auditor General's report, which was fairly new, and that it would be useful to understand whether or not the government had improved things or done anything to fix the problems identified.
However, to do it right away might be too soon. If we waited until the second week in June, or the end of the first week in June, or something like that, we might be able to get a proper assessment as to whether or not things had improved or changed. I'm not trying to put it off, but I want to provide enough of a gap to allow that to happen.
If the committee believes we're ready to that now, not to hear from the Auditor General but to find out whether or not the Auditor General's recommendations have been, in fact, implemented or taken into account.... I don't know if we need to hear from the Auditor General in that regard. We would presumably just look at the report.