I'm prepared to be flexible here. I don't know if we have to have a showdown on this. The idea of half an hour on May 10 is appealing, because that could get a start to the idea and working on it.
I'm not sure Kristina can say whether it's crucial that item seven be dealt with before May 31. We're not going to write a report on that. It might be something that could be dealt with early in June. I think, if we have the right spirit here, we can accomplish this. To say that this amendment is intended to shut down study I think is wrong. I think it's counterproductive to suggest that.
There seems to be a willingness by the committee to accommodate this study, to fit it in, but I don't think people are prepared to give up what has already been proposed and agreed on. It's just the question of finding the way to do it. I'm prepared to suggest that we only look at three meetings for the corrections study. We have three topics. They're all important. The same goes with the idea of following up on Kristina's motion. We need to do that. That's not time-sensitive in the sense that it has to be done tomorrow or next week, so we can be flexible. We can do all these things with the right will.
Maybe the amendment is a bit too specific by saying after we do all of this. I'm not going to propose an amendment to an amendment to an amendment, because the chair would rightly rule that out of order. However, I'm suggesting that we should try to find some consensus, if not today, then between now and Monday, and I agree that maybe on Monday, May 10, we can have a witness give us an initial briefing for an hour.