Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I wanted to correct what Ms. Lambropoulos said. The amendment doesn't mean that we aren't in favour of the study. I think we've all made it clear how important we think it is.
The importance of each study should not be prioritized. All the work this committee is undertaking is important. I think we need to do one thing at a time. We need to finish what we've started and, as Mr. Harris said, I don't think we need to stop everything we're doing right now to put this study forward.
If I understand the subcommittee report correctly, we were going to return on May 31 to begin a study of the Correctional Service of Canada. I don't know how many meetings are scheduled for that. However, as of May 31, there are seven meetings left. That still gives us time to do the study. I don't think this will kill the motion. In any event, I don't see what could come of holding deliberations for an hour on May 10 and beginning the rest in June.
I think we should finish what we started and fully immerse ourselves in this study afterwards. That would be the logical way to do it. In terms of the amendment, it also makes sense to say that we should finish what we have started right now and then continue with the rest.