Thanks, Chair.
Thanks to everybody for recognizing how important this is. I would actually argue, though, that this will essentially kill the motion. It took us from February until last week to do the systemic racism report and get it back to the analyst. We haven't even seen the Levesque study yet.
I would suggest we could do one hour on Monday, May 10, after we've done drafting instructions, and then take May 31 and June 2 as two dates we can do on this study, and then go back to the work plan. We can save that fourth meeting until maybe the following Monday or the Monday after. I would not support the amendment that's been put forward because it essentially kills this motion. We will not get time to do it, unless members are prepared to sit through the summer.
It will essentially kill it, so I will absolutely not support the amendment. I think we could do one hour on May 10, two meetings the week of May 31 and June 2, and then go back to committee business. I think that would be a compromise we could make.