It is.
I had only put down one meeting on that. Part of the reason is that I think we want to try to get it back to the analyst as quickly as we can. I recognize that there are a lot of recommendations in that, but I also think, if we put our minds to it, we can go through that report and determine what we all agree on. There might be a fair amount we don't agree on, which is fine, and those would be supplementary or dissenting reports.
We could try to do in a day the sections that we agree on. Jack has suggested two days, and that may be necessary and that's fine. We could do June 7 and 9 on Levesque, but the risk we all run is that the longer it takes for us to do Levesque, the less chance we have that it gets tabled in the House, because of translation and analyst writing time. Bear that in mind, but I think we could be flexible and do June 7 and 9 on Levesque if we needed to.
Tako, does that make sense?