But, again, if we go ahead in the bill to page 4, subclause 8(1) talks about the enforcement authority:
If the enforcement authority has reasonable grounds to believe that an organization committed an offence under section 5;
How do you interpret “reasonable grounds”? Do we not trust people to know the difference between a movie on Netflix and obvious pornography?
A movie, as Mr. Bittle said, that has very sexually explicit scenes is not being commercially made available for that single purpose; it's part of a story, whereas, I think we all know that pornography's main raison d'être is that sexually explicit material.