Well, I'm not going to be pushed to answer a question like “you'll agree with me”. It's not the kind of question I like. We have not defined in the bill who it is, so you can certainly think what you're thinking, but I would come back to the following fact. What would you have done to define pornography without taking the definition in the Criminal Code, which is one of our main laws in Canada, and which is serious, which has been interpreted by all the courts as being pornography, not as being artsy pictures of whatever?
You're right that there's a dose.... It's not scientific, but I would say this definition is pretty good and has been used in the past to show that this is not light.... This is pornography we're talking about when we're using sexually explicit material.