Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to the witnesses for being here.
Mr. Ripley, this is a very interesting conversation. I did not really understand the government's reluctance to support this bill, but now it's becoming a little clearer. I understand that, in your opinion, the definition of sexually explicit material is too broad. I'm looking for a solution.
Would this bill be more acceptable to you if it had used the term “pornography” and defined it outright, instead of the term “sexually explicit material”? Would that make a big difference to you? Would it reduce the likelihood that the bill would apply to nudity or a sex scene in a film?