The government's position is that, yes, they would be captured because the definition of sexually explicit material that is being proposed would include things like the depiction of sex scenes or nudity where it's nudity for a sexual purpose. Those services would be required to institute age verification to access that kind of content.
I think what needs to be understood is that the definition being proposed makes sense in the context of the Criminal Code, where it's speaking to a variety of offences, including when adults may be engaging with minors using sexually explicit content. It makes sense in that context.
However, it is not limited strictly to pornography. It is broader than pornography and would capture things like sex scenes or nudity.