Again, I would reiterate that I'm not in a place to take a position on behalf of the government with respect to amendments. What I would point you towards is that, again, the problematic aspects of the definition in the Criminal Code are really the paragraph 171.1(5)(a), where you do not see, like you see in paragraphs (b) and (c), for example, the caveat of “for a sexual purpose”.
Again, in paragraph (a), the language is broad enough to capture sex scenes or nudity regardless of whether they are being shown for a sexual purpose, for example. Again, it would capture entertainment content.