Again, it would be up to the courts and the organization that would look into that.
If you look at the definition of sexually explicit material in the Criminal Code, it describes “photographic, film, video or...visual representation” and a person “engaged in explicit sexual activity”. It could be “written material whose dominant characteristic is the description, for sexual purpose, of [explicit] sexual activity”.
It raises that question of what will be captured and bringing that clarity.
I understand that the purpose of this is to capture pornographic websites and other types of visual images and so on and protect children from that. That's one of the points I'm highlighting.