The five-year review is proposed there, and it's consistent with what exists in legislation.
We mentioned earlier viewing what other partners are doing around the world, and Five Eyes particularly, so that's a proposal there. It wouldn't, of course, preclude Parliament's ability to study or to bring legislation beforehand. What it does do, though, we think, and the reason it's proposed, is that it allows the government to propose legislation on a clock. It also allows for a review to ensure that CSIS's authorities are fit for purpose, whether its authorities remain justified and provide a regular review outside, hopefully, of emergency situations.
It also allows for civil society and stakeholders to galvanize as well to prepare themselves to contribute to that debate and that discussion in the hope of maturing a national security conversation in the country.