Perfect. Thank you so much.
Mr. Shull, I wanted to move to you.
Actually, both of you mentioned the issues around including other orders of government and, certainly, I appreciate your reading out the intro of the bill, because the intention is quite clear: to make sure the CSIS Act, which right now doesn't allow for information sharing at all and is quite restrictive, opens it up.
I'm curious about your specific advice around the definition of “public office holders” and to bring that in line, because it's not just municipal and provincial. It could be indigenous leadership that holds critical infrastructure, as an example. Is there a definition in another act or in other countries that you think would be more in line with keeping it more broad?