I think the bill covers a lot of things. As a human rights activist, I find it quite encouraging, and I mentioned this in my opening remarks. Also, the analytical reports submitted, I think, just yesterday by Sarah Teich and Hannah Taylor mention that many of the amendments in the legislation are quite encouraging.
Having said that, the analysis in the report points out, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, the lack of a definition for “transnational repression”. I think the aspect here is, as you mentioned, that foreign entities are common in transnational repression as well as in foreign interference. However—at least based on what some of the available literature seems to suggest—the target groups are different for foreign interference and transnational repression. In cases of foreign interference, the target group seems to be more within a state structure, whereas, in cases of transnational repression, it is the diaspora communities, such as Uyghurs and Tibetans.
That was the reason. Otherwise, we actually find it very encouraging.