I think what I was hoping to signal is that there's nothing in this bill that you can really reasonably strip out of the bill. This is the minimum threshold. That's the primary signal that I was hoping to send.
I appreciate that the government did have the guts to tackle section 16, because that is inherently a long-standing controversy. Just going there shows that there's some willingness to engage constructively on some key matters that might subsequently come up in other bills for further amendment.