At the outset, you mentioned a lack of courage and ambition. That's quite striking.
The bill states that there will be a review every five years. I can name you a series of laws that must be reviewed every five years, but they aren't reviewed. We're trying to create an incentive, as it were.
A little earlier, a witness suggested including a provision that says if there's no review after five years, the act is no longer valid. That would be akin to a nuclear bomb.
Would you have a suggestion for us to ensure that the act is reviewed every five years?