Thank you. I appreciate that.
I want to direct my next questions to the NCCM.
I appreciate the concerns you outlined with this bill. From the committee's perspective, this has been a busy week for us as we dive deep into Bill C-70.
I take note of your concern about the definition of the term “intimidation” in the proposed amendments to the SOIA. I had a chance to ask the Minister of Justice a question about that. I don't think I got a direct answer to my concerns, though he said—and I'm paraphrasing—that it would only be for when there's an element of foreign interference, not lawful and proper protests. It has to be something attempting to influence Canada and subvert Canadian interests. I would also note that in the existing SOIA, under section 24, the consent of the Attorney General is needed to prosecute any SOIA offence.
From your perspective, what definition of intimidation would the NCCM like to see put into this bill?