Evidence of meeting #113 for Public Safety and National Security in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was information.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

David Vigneault  Director, Canadian Security Intelligence Service
Commissioner Mark Flynn  Deputy Commissioner, Federal Policing, Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Heather Watts  Deputy Assistant Deputy Minister, Department of Justice
Richard Bilodeau  Director General, Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Nathalie Drouin  Deputy Clerk of the Privy Council and National Security and Intelligence Adviser to the Prime Minister, Privy Council Office
Sarah Estabrooks  Director General, Policy and Foreign Relations, Canadian Security Intelligence Service
Simon Noël  Intelligence Commissioner, Office of the Intelligence Commissioner
Ahmad Al Qadi  National Council of Canadian Muslims
Nusaiba Al Azem  National Council of Canadian Muslims
Marcus Kolga  Senior Fellow, Macdonald-Laurier Institute, As an Individual

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Under Mr. Harper's government, we did not have reports saying that foreign state actors had dealt with this. Under current legislation, you can disclose top secret information when it's in the public interest. What would be more in the public interest than a person who could be elected and is under the thumb of a hostile state actor? You can do that.

You talk about being disingenuous, and you can do this. Why won't you do so before the next election?

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc Liberal Beauséjour, NB

Speaking of being disingenuous, in Mr. Harper's government the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians didn't exist because Mr. Harper's government didn't believe that parliamentarians should have access to this information or be able to review the work of our intelligence agencies. During Mr. Harper's government in 2013, CSIS publicly identified an increasing risk of foreign interference in our democratic institutions—

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

It didn't identify names.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

Jennifer O'Connell Liberal Pickering—Uxbridge, ON

Don't interrupt.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc Liberal Beauséjour, NB

—and the Harper government did absolutely nothing.

Again, I think it's important to have context for these comments.

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Then you are okay with people going into an election and putting an X beside a name when they have a cloud of suspicion for every single one of us.

Let's face it, Minister. I think if there were six Conservatives on that list and no Liberals, we would have the names. Let's be honest here.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Thank you, Mr. Caputo. The minister may answer.

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Pardon me; I think I have another minute.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

No, you don't.

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Okay, thank you. I'm sorry.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

The minister may answer if he wishes.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc Liberal Beauséjour, NB

Mr. Caputo makes something up in saying that if there were six Conservatives and no other political parties on the list, of course we would release it. I'm not going to violate the Security of Information Act and risk prosecution for a political stunt, and I think Mr. Caputo knows better.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

We go now to Mr. Gaheer for six minutes.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

Iqwinder Gaheer Liberal Mississauga—Malton, ON

Thank you, Chair.

Thank you to all the witnesses for appearing before the committee.

Minister, I want to focus on foreign interference and its impact on diaspora communities, something that Mr. Virani touched on in his opening testimony. I know that you've spoken about it in the past as well. Different—

June 6th, 2024 / 8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

I have a point of order, Chair.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Go ahead, Mr. Genuis, on a point of order.

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Thank you, Chair.

During Mr. Caputo's round at the end, Ms. O'Connell was shouting at him across the floor, and now she's saying, “Boo hoo, get over it.”

Respectfully, Chair, I think you should call this member to order.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

Jennifer O'Connell Liberal Pickering—Uxbridge, ON

That's not a point of order.

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

It is a point of order. You're shouting at another member.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Mr. Genuis—

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

No, sorry, I have a point of order.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Speak to the chair, please.

I hear your point of order. I would encourage all members not to talk across the table and to talk through the chair when they are recognized. It would be helpful to us all.

8:35 a.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

I hope you call Ms. O'Connell to order, because she wasn't crosstalking; she was shouting to disrupt Mr. Caputo's round of questions.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Mr. Gaheer, go ahead, please.

8:35 a.m.

Liberal

Iqwinder Gaheer Liberal Mississauga—Malton, ON

Thank you, Chair.

I want to focus on foreign interference and its impact on diaspora communities. We've had different groups come here and raise that concern. One of the groups was the World Sikh Organization. They were largely in favour of this bill. They said that more needs to be done to counter foreign interference and that, in that respect, Bill C-70 is a step in the right direction. They did want to highlight, however, that CSIS would have the ability to disclose information to any person or entity should CSIS deem that relevant. This would be a great step, but they are concerned about whether foreign consular officials in Canada would count as entities, what kind of information could be disclosed to them and whether diaspora communities could be put at risk because of that disclosure.