That's why I find it difficult to review this bill in four days, frankly. The subjects addressed are very serious and very important, and the implications are significant. I find that the review is a bit rushed.
Mr. LeBlanc, I'm going to go back to an answer you gave a little earlier. It's true that party leaders can request the appropriate security clearance so that they can review the information. In doing so, however, they're also bound to secrecy in perpetuity. For us, at least, the offer is appreciated, but it's not very useful.
Is there another mechanism that could help us, apart from that?