Sure.
The definition of “arrangement” was chosen to identify situations where an individual is acting “in association with” or “under the direction of”.... It's meant to communicate that there must be some form of understanding between an entity that is conducting the influence and the foreign power. There has to be some sort of understanding or agreement.
It was purposely not narrowed because we wanted to make sure that no type of arrangement, if that understanding has occurred, escapes the registration obligation because this is about transparency. There is a limit, obviously, if somebody decides to say something on their own without talking to anybody and without an understanding. There's no registration obligation at that point, but it's meant to capture a broad set of circumstances.