I thank the member for his question.
Again, I want to reiterate that in fact we are concerned that these two individuals got through. That is why we are launching a collaborative review of our processes with our partners in the IRCC and CSIS to understand what happened and what, if anything, we could do differently.
What I would say is at the moment in time that the security screening partners reviewed these files, we made decisions based on a very robust process, based on the best information we had available at that time. When new information becomes available, for example, when somebody is in the country, there are different steps that we take. I won't comment on what CSIS and the RCMP may do in the criminal world, but from a CBSA point of view, if we have information regarding somebody's inadmissibility in the country, we will launch an inland investigation. As I noted, we're doing about 8,000 of those this year. Those inland investigations assess whether or not this person should be in the country. If not, we take that file, that evidence, to the Immigration and Refugee Board, who will make a decision about whether or not that person should be removed from the country.