Thank you, Chair.
There are a few things. We have had discussions. I'll propose it to our Liberal colleagues shortly.
First of all, I would say that this amendment by Ms. O'Connell does change the scope of the motion that we put forward. My understanding is that it's not admissible, then. If you're changing the scope of the motion with an amendment, it doesn't work. It's just not how this works is my understanding. It just changes it.
I just wanted to point that out. I'm not going to stick to it, but the amendment fundamentally changes what we were asking for. My understanding is that's not appropriate for amendments. I will leave it there, but the next time there is an amendment to a motion, we should just make sure that that is being followed.
We do have an alternative proposal, but I don't believe I can make an amendment to an amendment.
Is that correct?