Mr. Chair, in response to that, what I would say is that when this campaign was created, it complied with our terms of service. Our original diligence and our initial discussions with the organizer did not reveal any issues. We had constructive dialogue over how the funds were going to be disbursed.
Our teams were constantly reviewing all of the information, but there was a lot of misinformation, and that is why, in order to be very responsible in how we were handling this, we reached out to local law enforcement in response to their statement on January 31, to understand what was actually occurring, and upon receiving information over the next few days that showed it was now violating our terms of service—it had crossed the line and was now something that we could not support on the platform—we removed it on February 4.