Thank you.
I was here for those three weeks, as were most of my colleagues, albeit some could have been connecting remotely. That said, the reason I bring it up is that it's disconcerting to see in the very next sentence it mentions that “they”—again I'll use the word “they”, but we know now who “they” are—“shared reports of violence and threatening behaviour”.
Earlier, Ms. Wilford, you mentioned that there was “damage and destruction” happening. I'd like to know more about those reports. I ask this, Mr. Chair, because I'd like to know why.... We have asked the Ottawa police to attend and the OPP. Neither one of those groups has attended yet. Seeing this testimony today, I would like to point out that while of this was going on, we and our employees were all given briefings about attending work and walking to work, and nowhere did I see in any of the reports shared with us that there was violence, threatening behaviour and damage and destruction happening. Quite frankly, I encouraged—not encouraged, but I allowed my staff to still show up for work every day. I walked to work every day, as did most of my colleagues. We were given briefings on how to walk to work and how to walk into work.
This is a little disconcerting, so perhaps I could hear a little bit more on these shared reports.
I'd also like to perhaps hear, as a point of order from the chair or the clerk, as to why they have not attended yet and if they will be attending.