I'm sorry to cut you off, Mr. Wark, but you mentioned the indictment, and I want to get to that. I only have a minute and a half left.
Mr. Scott was talking about solutions, and I want to get there. When it comes to solutions, obviously, and when it comes to Canadians amplifying content in good faith, as much as it might be misguided, or in the case of Russians amplifying homegrown Canadian content, the path to enforcement isn't clear to me.
Free speech does matter, and we have to protect free speech. In that specific indictment, you have Founder-1 and Founder-2, and we clearly know that Russians are funding their operation here. I don't know about the actual producers of the content. Maybe they don't know, right? They say they don't know. However, Founder-1 and Founder-2 knew what was going on, based on the information in that indictment.
Is the law clear enough to ensure there's going to be action against Founder-1 and Founder-2? They're not charged yet, but is the law clear enough that there's a path for that?