Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I was just trying to ensure that.... The wording of the motion says “no less than six meetings”, so I think it's quite open. I was just trying to find a space where the parties' witness lists were all treated in an equal manner.
If people have an issue with that or want further clarification, I don't want to interrupt the proceedings. From what I've heard so far, there seems to be broad agreement with the overall direction this motion is taking, so if people want to clarify that or suggest a friendly amendment, I'm open to that, but I don't want to, in any way, delay other committee members.