I think a lot of our Five Eyes partners would like to see Canada do more, frankly. This has been expressed from time to time, particularly in terms of certain kinds of capacities to collect intelligence globally. There have been criticisms directed at Canada that we do not have, for example, a foreign intelligence service, unlike all of our Five Eyes partners. That's an area where Canada continues to face pressure.
I think where Canada is highly regarded as a partner within the Five Eyes is with regard to its signals intelligence capabilities in foreign intelligence collection and cybersecurity. Canada is also regarded as a useful partner in the kinds of strategic intelligence assessments it can share with our Five Eyes partners, and that Canadian view is often regarded as a useful touchpoint for other countries to consider how they're looking at global threats.
On your opening remark about the Five Eyes being an equal trading relationship, the reality is that it's never been that. The United States is by far and away the largest and greatest intelligence power in the Five Eyes. Other countries try to make their contribution, but we get a lot more out of the Five Eyes than we can put in, and no one has ever suggested that we should have an equal trading relation on intelligence there.