Mr. Chair, I find it interesting. I didn't know who Ms. Chen was in advance of the U.S. indictment. These kinds of conspiracy theories-peddling accounts tend to be a dime a dozen. The really interesting factor, though, is who's paying for some of this disinformation.
The witness has actually attacked trans kids, the 2SLGBT community, women and men who stand up for women's equality. She suggested they're on their periods and should eat a tub of ice cream. She doesn't seem to care about the ramifications of comments like this posted on the Internet, or attacking Ukrainians and Ukrainian sovereignty and basically saying whatever she feels like without consideration of implications to those people she attacks.
I find it quite interesting that now, as she has an opportunity to defend some of these comments, perhaps it's the single lady's cat that's got her tongue, because she seems to be very opinionated when it comes to views that she wants to spew, but not how she's making money on spreading those views and getting those likes.
I think it is pretty interesting that those who believe in freedom until they face consequences for their own actions refuse to take responsibility for those actions and for not recognizing laws that exist in Canada and the U.S. regarding sanctions. They think it's okay if an individual wants to make money off sanctioned entities, but then, when it comes time to answer for those things, they don't seem able to find words to speak. I find it incredibly disappointing, but I'm not surprised, if I'm being completely honest.
I'll give you, Ms. Chen, one last opportunity. How much money did you or your company receive from the Russian government, a Russian entity or a Russian-sanctioned entity to promote and spread the materials that you spread online?