Thank you.
We can clearly see how this is going to go. The committee can be just points of order and will now just be debate because they don't like my calling out the fact that Conservatives didn't ask about India's involvement, which was outlined by community members through testimony and the RCMP press conference, and instead, actually, it was Mr. Motz who asked about criminals in India, which seemed to be of higher importance than what Canadians were feeling in this country.
To add it as an amendment to this motion does a real disservice to the very compelling testimony we heard. It feels like a slapped-on saving face for a motion that, clearly, was drawn up by Conservatives who don't want to talk about India interfering with our democratic institutions and the allegations around violence in our communities being organized, deeply, with organized crime from India.
I don't think the fact that it was left out of this motion is a mistake. The fact that Conservatives would like to move away from that study is not surprising, given how—