For your benefit, Mr. Chair, I want to make sure that it is understood where we are right now.
We are on an amendment to the original motion. The problem with Ms. Dancho's rationale, as to why she was proposing it and wanted to put it forward, is that it is premised on the notion that the amendment will pass. That's why you can't bring forward a subamendment that assumes the amendment will pass when it's not related to it.
I don't think there's anything wrong with what she's bringing forward; it's just not at the right time.