Thank you.
Having sat as the chair in justice, I think there is a precedent once somebody has refused to testify. If the committee so wills, they can subpoena the person. It's not to say there was any wrongdoing. It's a matter of getting the witness here if the committee decides that it's very important and vital to have that person as a witness.
I don't think this committee decides or any committees decide if somebody's guilty of anything. It's an investigative tool and a reporting tool. Never is the guilt the reason to subpoena somebody. It's to have them here and respond. As Parliament is paramount, I think it's very important that people respond to that and take it very seriously. If they don't respond in another manner, I think a subpoena is an appropriate method.