Thank you, Mr. Shull.
It's very interesting, listening about the speaking indictments. With you being a lawyer in the U.S. and me being a lawyer trained in Canada, I think the difference.... I agree with you. The speaking indictment of an American court is pretty appealing, because it actually lays out the exact evidence, how it was obtained and what it is, and the general public sees that before a person even stands trial. In contrast, in Canada, the accused usually gets the disclosure after being charged in court, and it's not really made public; it slowly trickles out. This is probably a difference between the Westminster model versus the American model of legal process.
Do you think there are ways that can be...? I don't know if you're also well versed in Canadian law, but could you give some opinion on how Canadians could do it better without changing our legal system in its entirety?