I think that looking at ways to safeguard our democracy is important. There is foreign interference that occurs. I would say that it's not limited to India, but India is obviously a very high topic because of the extrajudicial killing in Surrey. For a lot of countries, the ability to have a working relationship with a consular office is important. If you want to go back home and you need a visa, having a productive relationship is important.
I look at other instances, such as Sri Lanka. We're building a Tamil genocide memorial in Brampton, and we've been recipients of active intervention, opposition, obstruction and protests coordinated by the Sri Lanka High Commission. There's an example where we believe that our democratic efforts, adopted by the entire council, were being challenged and subverted by a foreign government.
I don't think it's limited to India, but I do think diasporic communities are struggling with some of the activity of foreign consular offices. I was reading a newspaper article recently that said an educational session was done in Ottawa recently with foreign diplomats on what is appropriate, what is inappropriate and what crosses the line. I think that's healthy. Maybe some of those standards can be set by this committee to help clarify what veers into the political and what veers into intimidation of the community in Canada.