Thanks, Chair.
I think the first change is redundant. I don't think we need to add that. It's included in “illegally diverted”. I'm ambivalent about whether it says “recognizing” or “increasing”; it doesn't really matter. As I said, I used the wording from a previous motion at public safety, hoping that we wouldn't have to debate, but “increasing” is fine.
I think adding “causes of high recidivism” could be covered under the wording that's already there. If that's the focus people want to take when we have witnesses, including the witnesses they choose to call, I think it's already covered in the wording that is there.
I think the changes are not needed, to be honest with you. We'll accomplish the same things with what we've already done and put forward.