Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Further to my last comment, I'll just clarify. In the original motion, paragraph (a) says the following from Ms. Michaud: “hold, by December 17, 2021”—which is this Friday—“at least one (1) additional meeting to hear from Royal Canadian Mounted Police officials for a duration of three (3) hours”.
In my previous comment, what I was asking about is that Ms. Damoff's motion takes out the requirement to have the meeting by December 17, this Friday, and then adds the CBSA, so we have to have the CBSA and RCMP together before February 4, whereas Ms. Michaud's original motion said we'd have to have the RCMP by this December 17, Friday.
I want the committee to be clear that the amendment will in essence ensure that we will not see the RCMP before we rise for break, and I just want to make sure that this was the aim of Ms. Michaud in her motion.